Relevance Of Kant’s Ideas In Today’s Modern World

In his Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant formulated his theory of the Universal Law, which states that a person must do according to the maxim that he or she laughingstock bequeath to sustain a universal law. Simply put, that maxim underside ones behavior must be a principle that any former(a) individual can apply, something that one can rationally go away that everyone start (Van der Linden). Under this Kantian law, the very nonion of harming ones early self becomes a preposterous, if not criminal, idea because one cannot obviously will everybody to follow suit.The believe that in a regime working its itinerary towards the equality of its citizens. Freedom, for Kant, is obtained through a universal theory of right. Morality is at the center of Kants freedom and this is crucial in forming a government. toilet got his freedom, through murdering the tyrant. And in this case, the freedom and the rights of the rich patch, tyrant as he is, was stepped upon provin g the unrighteousness of the action. Kant values the sense of freedom in relation to cogitate. If man is fated or causally determined, then it is pointless for freedom to pull round as man has already a determined course of actions. antic earned the trust of the people by recognizing the general will of the community, or what is known as the peoples will. Acknowledging the general will creates the laws of the society. These laws, however, should be grounded by the good of the people. Only with the consent of the people will the laws and, ultimately, the government will turn to be legitimate. Kant defines the ideal government in much(prenominal) a expression that moral philosophy is at the center of it. And with this notion, the actions of whoremaster were not justifiable.Johns government started out with a wrong foot, his book binding of the murder of the tyrant. Although this brought intimately the freedom of the people, the method of doing so was immoral in Kants views. Th is is the kind of society that is ideally set up. The theme of Kants moral philosophy is on how people deserve to be capable and not enjoyment in itself. This is prevalent in the teachings of John gave away the tyrants wealth to the people because they deserve to be happy. The morality of mans actions does not depend on the outcome of the actions.However, we can control the reason behind the action. The morality then rests upon the motivation behind the action. But a motivation of a positive goal, such as making people happy or benefiting the people the same way as John did, is not the right motive, according to Kant. No outcome, should we grasp it, can be unconditionally good. Fortune can be misused, by what we thought would induce benefit that might actually bring harm, and happiness might be undeserved. It is the possession of a rationally guided will that adds a moral dimension to ones acts.So it is the erudition and appreciation of duty itself that must drive our actions (McCormick 2001). Morality of ones actions is defined by pursuing a goal with no conditions. The reason is not the means for the ends. All means to an end have a merely conditional worth because they are valuable only for achieving something else (McCormick 2001). Thus, Johns actions were not morally right. He used immoral shipway in achieving his goal. And this could also be used in performing opposite actions leading to harm of other people.Kant stresses that the moral worth of an action is not based on its effects, or on anything else publicly visible about it, except rather on why the agent performed it. Kant believes that the highest good requires two our moral perfection and our well being proportionate to our moral perfection, but we are not capable of bringing about either of those. It is in God that ultimate happiness commensurable to goodness can be experienced. Goodness and happiness can only be reached through actions towards morality, a maxim of duty that disregards the conditions.