Attribution Theory Essay

No creature in this planet dissolve cause the faculty of causa as much as we gentle psyches do. As rational beings, we normally engage in an array of activities which require unfavor open thinking or thoughtful consideration. At least for those who are providential to be gifted with normal bodily functions, it is axiomatic to suppose that we clement some(prenominal)ones are expected to arrogate reason to everything that we do.For instance, we do not raise up up at two in the morning and prepare to go to school simply for no reason whatsoever. In a vogue of speaking, the faculty of human reason allows us to do things on theme of some reasonable purposes. The way we make sense or put reason to almost everything that surrounds us makes us, more than anything else, human persons by decent of logic and supposition. Reading done the article The Attri scarcelyion hypothesis, I am able to even more affirm the fundamental movement of human reason to sample for explanation of things. Therein I was able to learn that the surmisal of ascription draws from the basic supposition that human reason so naturally tends to seek for explanation to things. This, in many ways, is elaborately knitted to the logic underneath the rationale of causality, which basically assumes that our minds try expectant to grapple for sufficient explanations to help us make sense of everything that happens. The guess of Attribution is no less different in that, like the principle of causality, it too tries to seek for an adequate explanation of things. All things considered, it can change us to peek into the seemingly insatiable desire of human persons to seek explanation for things. Secondly, the article also made me realize how potent, nay, powerful human reason can become. In the article, it cites a number of studies that were done so as demonstrate the efficacy of the theory. The mainline thesis is to show that the theory of Attribution, especially when it is internally reinforced, can produce behavioral changes to a person or groups of persons. The article even notes that when concourse tend to attribute genuine events as directly stemming from their personal involvement, it produces significant behavioral changes.When for instance, a person is repeatedly introduced to the idea, say, that his or her high grades are attributable to the painstaking but admirable effort he pours into his studies, it creates a personal belief ashes that appear to cater to such reinforcements. This means that a person who is able to embrace a belief that his or her efforts serve him or her puff up in the process will normally become motivated to breeding on his or her own. This displays, more than anything else, the power of human reason to record personal belief systems into tangible behavioral patterns. But reading through the article also made me feel a bit wary as well. If through the theory of Attribution we can make commonwealth create new attitudes or b eliefs or behaviors depending upon the explanation they make, thus it behooves us to proceed with much care in reinforcing beliefs on them (The Attribution Theory). Surely, we cannot allow people to think negatively about themselves, especially on issues which may involve anger, grief, guilt, among others.As indeed, we cannot let people believe that some tragic moments in life, which can happen beyond our control, are internally attributable to their doings just the same. If we truly want to create an empowered individual by applying the theory of Attribution, then it is only justified that we ought to train positive reinforcements on to everyone so as to create positive avenues for behavioral changes. Along the same vein, we must always help protect people from creating a monster out of internal belief-systems, which, on the final analysis, can eventually, nay only translate to ill-natured and unfortunate behaviors.Work CitedThe Theory of Attribution, SBB 1996. Retrieved 10 Sept ember 2008,